Identifier / Programs / Windows
addinutil.exe
AddInUtil.exe file version info (xCyclopedia)
LOLBAS Execute 3 Sigma rules name it 1 ATT&CK technique 1 documented command 2 known copies with hashes
How addinutil.exe is abused
Execute T1218 System Binary Proxy Execution
-addinrootEach abuse is LOLBAS's category and the options and words it uses; the full write-up is on LOLBAS's page for addinutil.exe.
1 documented command
Execute T1218 System Binary Proxy Execution User privileges
AddinUtil is executed from the directory where the 'Addins.Store' payload exists, AddinUtil will execute the 'Addins.Store' payload.
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\AddinUtil.exe -AddinRoot:.IdentifyTrips 1 Sigma rule: mediumUncommon AddinUtil.EXE CommandLine Execution by Michael McKinley (@McKinleyMike), Tony Latteri (@TheLatteri)
The command the identifier reads trips a Sigma process-creation rule. These commands and their descriptions are from LOLBAS’s entry for addinutil.exe, by Michael McKinley @MckinleyMike, at commit 2056cb766250 of 2026-09-26, under the GPL-3.0 and LOLBAS’s notice, with no warranty. Changed: Markdown is shown formatted. The source is in lolbas-gtfobins-commands.json.gz, and the full entry is on LOLBAS’s page for addinutil.exe. The identifier reads it with LOLBAS’s placeholders filled in: a URL as https://example.com/file, a share as \\192.0.2.10\share\file, a path as C:\Data\file and a command as calc.exe.
What detects it
Is it the real addinutil.exe?
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\2 known copies
4.8.4161.0 built by: NET48REL1 · C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\AddInUtil.exe · signed by Microsoft Windows
93091f1a0c8605f400a259bb49bd13ef4c195a1e9183989fa4ebe44f8cd22f1b4.8.4084.0 built by: NET48REL1 · C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\AddInUtil.exe · signed by Microsoft Windows
eba869ef2a566f1aa776344717e894a863b5bbca79807e410c651d54d7c4d96dFrom the file’s version info and the copies recorded by xCyclopedia (MIT). A copy in another folder, signed by someone else or with another hash is not necessarily malicious, but it is worth a closer look. In Ceplin, "<sha256>".whatis() says which known copy a hash is.